hmm...
thanks to a letter i received from the journal 'International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education', which suggested that a manuscript which i submitted to them needed a few changes, i stumbled upon the following related works, which i can now use to improve the larger thesis:
- Gaughran's sub-factor theory, which formed the basis of my pre- and post-tests, actually has its roots in earlier work by Guay and others. apparently, Gaughran adapted his work (using technology to ease the rendering process) from a twenty-item test of "cognitive restructuring in the spatial domain", which, in turn, is the intellectual property of the Purdue Research Foundation;
- Ken Johnson of the Australian National University and i, both share a similar concern that observation is a key (and often overlooked) skill that is necessary for the effective learning of geography. apparently i have been unknowingly in concurrence with both Johnson and Meinig in my belief that the familiarity of geographers with our discipline has numbed us to the fact that geographical thinking and understanding (ie, spatial cognition) is not something that comes naturally to everyone, least of all our students;
- Johnson's writings also brought to my attention the work of the Virtual Field Course, which was initiated in 1996 and is a collaboration between the University of London, Leicester University and Oxford Brookes University. Essentially, the endeavour used panoramas, Java, and VRML to address (inter alia) the problem of transposing an interpretation of a two-dimensional representation into a three-dimensional environment. it's this very problem which drives my own work;
- J Gail Armstrong-Hall has some fascinating views on how spatial skills differ between the genders. This certainly comes in useful in my own work. For example, according to her, so-called male spatial skills include 'tracking using sense of direction', 'imagined mental movement of objects' and 'abstract mental movement in any direction at any distance'. Hmm...
- Simon Catling of Oxford Brookes' Institute of Education is no stranger to geographical thinking, yet i was only introduced to his name earlier this month at the recent conference. i've been trying to find out more about his work, and today i unearthed his emphasis on how environmental perceptions are contingent upon individual experiences, and the sharing thereof. you'll recognise this, of course, to be one of the fundamental premises upon which my research rests. Catling further makes a distinction between two kinds of geographical spaces: first, that which can be viewed and understood from a single vantage point, and second, that which needs to be explored and _roamed_around_ in order for a sense of its experience to be _constructed_.
Technorati Tags: cognition, constructivism, expert, gender, geography, learning, navigation, semiotics, wayfinding