a theoretical structure which kept being mentioned over and over again in various keynotes and sessions during the recent ICET conference was that of Lipman's 'community of inquiry' framework, within which Garrison et al situate 'social presence', 'teaching presence' and 'cognitive presence'. the latter is defined as the extent to which learners are able to contruct and confirm meaning through sustained reflection and discourse. cognitive presence therefore reflects higher-order thinking processes.
"constructing and confirming meaning through sustained reflection and discourse"... sound familiar? it should, because essentially that's the crux of much of what my present research is looking at too.
it was only yesterday, and especially today, that i first realised how useful this structure might be to inform my research data. thanks to Judi Baron's presentation yesterday, on the evaluation of what she termed the 'Mekong e-sim', used in her work at the University of Adelaide, i began to realise that the phases of the practical inquiry model, which (according to Garrison et al) "operationalises" cognitive presence, mirror quite closely what the students were doing during in the field during their Structured Academic Controversy activity - namely, a triggering event, exploration, integration and resolution.
Garrison et al applied this model of practical inquiry to analyse the higher order critical thinking - that is, the cognitive presence - that takes place during computer-mediated communication (CMC). they were looking at asynchronous text-based discourse which results from online conferencing. their basic unit of analysis was the message, though later writers (such as Fahy) make a case for looking at the sub-unit of the sentence. either way, in the case of SMS, message and sentence are more often than not the same :-)
i am very relieved to have been made aware, in His perfect timing, about the work of Garrison and others in this area. it has plugged a real gap in my data analysis :-)
Technorati Tags: cognition, constructivism, discourse, ICET2004, learning, semiotics